Skip to content
AI and Hiring - VerityAI
Back to All Topics

AI and Hiring

Using AI to screen candidates pulls in employment law, discrimination rules and the EU AI Act at once. These guides cover the bias audits and disclosures employers now have to get right.

All AI and Hiring Posts (24)

Frequently asked questions

Is it legal to use AI in recruitment?

It can be, but it's regulated and the rules vary by location. New York City's Local Law 144 requires a bias audit and candidate notice for automated employment decision tools, the EU AI Act classifies most AI used in recruitment and hiring as high-risk with strict obligations, and in the UK you still have to meet the Equality Act 2010 and UK GDPR. So legal use depends on where you hire and what safeguards you've put in place.

What is a bias audit for hiring AI and who needs one?

A bias audit is an independent test of whether an automated hiring tool produces different outcomes across protected groups such as sex and race. Under New York City Local Law 144 it's mandatory before you use such a tool on NYC candidates, and the results must be published. Even where it isn't legally required, a bias audit is the main evidence you'd rely on to defend a hiring tool under UK or EU discrimination law.

How does the EU AI Act affect AI used in hiring?

The EU AI Act lists AI systems used for recruitment, candidate screening and evaluation as high-risk, which triggers duties around risk management, data governance, human oversight, transparency and record-keeping. If you hire people in the EU using such a tool, those obligations apply regardless of where your company sits. It sits on top of, not instead of, existing discrimination law.

Related topics